← Back to all projects

VPN WIREGUARD TAILSCALE LEARNING PROJECTS

Deep Dive: VPNs, WireGuard & Overlay Networks with C

Understanding VPNs and overlay networks like Tailscale through hands-on C programming projects.

Core Concept Analysis

To truly understand VPNs and overlay networks, you need to grasp these building blocks:

Layer 1: Network Foundations

TUN/TAP virtual interfaces - How the OS creates “fake” network devices
IP packet structure - Headers, payloads, routing decisions
UDP sockets - Why VPNs use UDP (hint: they do their own reliability)
Routing tables - How packets decide where to go

Layer 2: Cryptographic Primitives

Symmetric encryption (ChaCha20-Poly1305) - Fast bulk data encryption
Asymmetric key exchange (Curve25519) - Establishing shared secrets
Noise Protocol Framework - WireGuard’s handshake protocol
Perfect Forward Secrecy - Why compromising today’s keys doesn’t expose yesterday’s traffic

Layer 3: Protocol Design

Tunneling - Encapsulating packets inside other packets
NAT traversal - Punching holes through firewalls (STUN/TURN/ICE)
Peer discovery - How Tailscale finds your devices
Mesh networking - Direct peer-to-peer connections vs relay servers

Project 1: TUN Interface Packet Logger

File: VPN_WIREGUARD_TAILSCALE_LEARNING_PROJECTS.md
Programming Language: C
Coolness Level: Level 3: Genuinely Clever
Business Potential: 3. The “Service & Support” Model
Difficulty: Level 2: Intermediate
Knowledge Area: Networking / Linux Kernel Interface
Software or Tool: TUN/TAP
Main Book: “The Linux Programming Interface” by Michael Kerrisk

What you’ll build: A C program that creates a virtual network interface (TUN device), captures all packets routed through it, and displays their structure in real-time on the terminal.

Why it teaches VPNs: Every VPN starts with a TUN/TAP interface. This is the “magic” that makes your OS think there’s a real network device. You’ll see raw IP packets exactly as WireGuard sees them before encryption.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Opening and configuring a TUN device via ioctl() (maps to understanding virtual interfaces)
Parsing IP packet headers (maps to understanding what VPNs actually encrypt)
Setting up routes so traffic flows through your interface (maps to VPN routing)
Handling both IPv4 and IPv6 packets (maps to dual-stack VPN support)

Key Concepts:

TUN/TAP interfaces: “The Linux Programming Interface” by Michael Kerrisk (Ch. 64) - Definitive explanation of virtual network devices
IP packet structure: “TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1” by W. Richard Stevens (Ch. 3-4) - Visual breakdown of IP headers
ioctl system calls: “Advanced Programming in the UNIX® Environment” by Stevens & Rago (Ch. 17)
Raw sockets: “The Sockets Networking API” by Stevens, Fenner & Rudoff (Ch. 28)

Difficulty: Intermediate Time estimate: 1-2 weeks Prerequisites: Basic C, familiarity with Linux command line, understanding of IP addresses

Real world outcome:

Run your program, then ping through your TUN interface
See each ICMP packet displayed with source IP, destination IP, protocol, and payload hex dump
Output like: [TUN0] 192.168.1.100 -> 8.8.8.8 | ICMP Echo Request | 64 bytes

Learning milestones:

Successfully create a TUN device that shows up in ip link - you understand how virtual interfaces are born
Route traffic through your TUN and see raw packets - you understand the packet capture path
Parse and display IP/ICMP/TCP/UDP headers correctly - you understand packet structure deeply
Handle fragmented packets - you understand why VPNs care about MTU

Project 2: Simple UDP Tunnel (Unencrypted)

File: VPN_WIREGUARD_TAILSCALE_LEARNING_PROJECTS.md
Programming Language: C
Coolness Level: Level 3: Genuinely Clever
Business Potential: 4. The “Open Core” Infrastructure
Difficulty: Level 3: Advanced
Knowledge Area: Networking / Tunneling
Software or Tool: UDP Tunneling
Main Book: “TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1” by W. Richard Stevens

What you’ll build: A point-to-point tunnel that takes packets from a TUN interface, wraps them in UDP, sends them to a peer, unwraps them, and injects them into the peer’s TUN. Basically a VPN without encryption.

Why it teaches VPNs: This IS a VPN (minus security). You’ll implement the exact packet flow that WireGuard uses: App → TUN → Encrypt → UDP → Network → UDP → Decrypt → TUN → App. You’re just skipping encrypt/decrypt for now.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Bidirectional packet forwarding (TUN ↔ UDP socket) using select() or poll()
Handling packet boundaries (UDP is message-oriented, unlike TCP)
Configuring both endpoints to route traffic through the tunnel
Dealing with MTU issues (encapsulation adds overhead)

Key Concepts:

UDP socket programming: “TCP/IP Sockets in C” by Donahoo & Calvert (Ch. 4) - Practical UDP client/server patterns
I/O multiplexing: “The Linux Programming Interface” by Kerrisk (Ch. 63) - select(), poll(), epoll()
Tunneling concepts: “TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 2” by Wright & Stevens (Ch. 19)
MTU and fragmentation: “Computer Networks” by Tanenbaum & Wetherall (Ch. 5.5)

Difficulty: Intermediate Time estimate: 1-2 weeks Prerequisites: Project 1 completed, understanding of UDP

Real world outcome:

Run tunnel server on Machine A, tunnel client on Machine B
ping 10.0.0.1 from Machine B reaches Machine A through your tunnel
SSH through the tunnel: ssh user@10.0.0.1 works
Watch Wireshark show your encapsulated UDP packets crossing the network

Learning milestones:

Packets flow one direction (A→B) - you understand encapsulation
Bidirectional flow works - you understand full-duplex tunneling
You can SSH through the tunnel - you’ve built a functional (insecure) VPN
You handle MTU properly - you understand why VPNs reduce MTU

Project 3: Add Encryption (ChaCha20-Poly1305)

File: VPN_WIREGUARD_TAILSCALE_LEARNING_PROJECTS.md
Programming Language: C
Coolness Level: Level 4: Hardcore Tech Flex
Business Potential: 1. The “Resume Gold”
Difficulty: Level 4: Expert
Knowledge Area: Cryptography / Network Security
Software or Tool: ChaCha20-Poly1305 / Libsodium
Main Book: “Serious Cryptography” by Jean-Philippe Aumasson

What you’ll build: Extend your UDP tunnel to encrypt all packets using ChaCha20-Poly1305 (the same cipher WireGuard uses) with a pre-shared key.

Why it teaches VPNs: This transforms your toy tunnel into something resembling a real VPN. You’ll understand why WireGuard chose ChaCha20 (fast in software, constant-time, no side channels) and how authenticated encryption prevents tampering.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Integrating a crypto library (libsodium or OpenSSL)
Managing nonces correctly (NEVER reuse a nonce!)
Handling authentication tag verification
Secure key storage and memory handling (sodium_memzero)

Resources for key challenges:

“Serious Cryptography, 2nd Edition” by Aumasson (Ch. 8-9) - Best explanation of ChaCha20-Poly1305 and AEAD
libsodium documentation (doc.libsodium.org) - Practical crypto implementation

Key Concepts:

AEAD (Authenticated Encryption): “Serious Cryptography” by Aumasson (Ch. 8) - Why encryption without authentication is dangerous
ChaCha20 stream cipher: “Serious Cryptography” by Aumasson (Ch. 5)
Nonce management: Salsa20/ChaCha20 design paper by DJB - Why nonce reuse is catastrophic
Constant-time operations: “Practical Cryptographic Systems” - Preventing timing attacks

Difficulty: Intermediate-Advanced Time estimate: 1-2 weeks Prerequisites: Projects 1-2, basic understanding of symmetric encryption

Real world outcome:

Capture traffic with Wireshark - see only encrypted gibberish
Modify a byte in transit - watch authentication fail and packet get dropped
Compare performance: your tunnel vs unencrypted vs OpenVPN
Verify with tcpdump that no plaintext leaks

Learning milestones:

Encrypt and decrypt a single packet correctly - you understand AEAD basics
Nonce handling works (no reuse, proper increment) - you understand crypto hygiene
Authentication failures are caught - you understand why AEAD matters
No plaintext visible in packet captures - you’ve built real encryption

Project 4: Key Exchange (Noise Protocol IK)

File: VPN_WIREGUARD_TAILSCALE_LEARNING_PROJECTS.md
Programming Language: C
Coolness Level: Level 5: Pure Magic (Super Cool)
Business Potential: 5. The “Industry Disruptor”
Difficulty: Level 5: Master
Knowledge Area: Cryptography / Protocol Design
Software or Tool: Noise Protocol / WireGuard
Main Book: “Real-World Cryptography” by David Wong

What you’ll build: Replace your pre-shared key with a proper handshake using the Noise Protocol Framework (specifically the IK pattern that WireGuard uses), implementing Curve25519 key exchange.

Why it teaches VPNs: This is the heart of WireGuard’s security model. You’ll understand:

Why static + ephemeral keys provide both authentication AND forward secrecy
How two parties derive the same shared secret without transmitting it
Why WireGuard’s handshake is so much simpler than IKE/IPsec

Core challenges you’ll face:

Implementing Curve25519 scalar multiplication (or using libsodium)
Following the Noise protocol state machine precisely
Deriving symmetric keys from DH outputs using HKDF
Handling identity hiding (encrypted static keys)

Resources for key challenges:

Noise Protocol Framework specification (noiseprotocol.org) - The definitive reference
WireGuard whitepaper by Jason Donenfeld - See how WireGuard uses Noise IK

Key Concepts:

Diffie-Hellman key exchange: “Serious Cryptography” by Aumasson (Ch. 11) - Foundation of all modern key exchange
Elliptic curve cryptography: “Serious Cryptography” by Aumasson (Ch. 12) - Why Curve25519 is fast and safe
Noise Protocol Framework: Official specification (noiseprotocol.org) - WireGuard’s handshake protocol
Key derivation (HKDF): RFC 5869 - Turning DH output into encryption keys

Difficulty: Advanced Time estimate: 2-3 weeks Prerequisites: Projects 1-3, understanding of public-key cryptography concepts

Real world outcome:

Two peers that have never communicated establish a secure tunnel
Capture the handshake - see only public keys and ciphertext
Each session uses different keys (forward secrecy)
Impersonation attempts fail immediately

Learning milestones:

Generate Curve25519 keypairs - you understand elliptic curve basics
Perform DH and derive matching symmetric keys on both sides - you understand key exchange
Full Noise IK handshake works - you understand WireGuard’s security model
Forward secrecy demonstrated (new keys each session) - you understand why this matters

Project 5: NAT Traversal & Hole Punching

File: VPN_WIREGUARD_TAILSCALE_LEARNING_PROJECTS.md
Programming Language: C / Go
Coolness Level: Level 4: Hardcore Tech Flex
Business Potential: 4. The “Open Core” Infrastructure
Difficulty: Level 4: Expert
Knowledge Area: Networking / NAT
Software or Tool: STUN / TURN
Main Book: “Peer-to-Peer Communication Across NATs” by Ford et al.

What you’ll build: Extend your VPN to work when both peers are behind NAT (the common case). Implement UDP hole punching with a simple coordination server.

Why it teaches Tailscale/Twingate: This is the “magic” that makes Tailscale work. Most devices are behind NAT and can’t receive incoming connections. Hole punching lets peers connect directly without a relay. You’ll understand why Tailscale needs coordination servers.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Understanding NAT behavior types (Full Cone, Restricted, Symmetric)
Implementing a STUN-like server to discover external IP:port
Coordinating simultaneous hole punch attempts
Falling back to relay when direct connection fails

Resources for key challenges:

RFC 5389 (STUN) - How to discover your public address
“Peer-to-Peer Communication Across NATs” by Ford, Srisuresh, Kegel - The definitive hole-punching paper

Key Concepts:

NAT types and behavior: RFC 4787 - Understanding NAT classification
STUN protocol: RFC 5389 - Discovering external addresses
UDP hole punching: Ford et al. paper “Peer-to-Peer Communication Across NATs” - The technique itself
ICE framework: RFC 8445 - How real systems combine STUN/TURN

Difficulty: Advanced Time estimate: 2-3 weeks Prerequisites: Projects 1-4, understanding of NAT

Real world outcome:

Two peers behind different home NATs connect directly
Coordination server shows the exchange of endpoint information
Watch with Wireshark as hole-punch packets open the NAT mapping
See direct peer-to-peer traffic (not relayed through your server)

Learning milestones:

STUN server correctly reports external IP:port - you understand NAT mapping discovery
Hole punch succeeds between two symmetric NAT peers - you understand the timing/coordination
System detects when hole punch fails and could relay - you understand Tailscale’s “DERP” relays
Multiple peers can discover and connect - you understand mesh coordination

Project Comparison Table

Project	Difficulty	Time	Depth of Understanding	Fun Factor
TUN Packet Logger	Intermediate	1-2 weeks	⭐⭐⭐ Foundation	⭐⭐⭐ Seeing raw packets is cool
UDP Tunnel	Intermediate	1-2 weeks	⭐⭐⭐⭐ Core VPN mechanics	⭐⭐⭐⭐ “I built a VPN!”
Add Encryption	Int-Advanced	1-2 weeks	⭐⭐⭐⭐ Crypto in practice	⭐⭐⭐ Satisfying security
Key Exchange	Advanced	2-3 weeks	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Deep crypto	⭐⭐⭐ Complex but rewarding
NAT Traversal	Advanced	2-3 weeks	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Tailscale magic	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ “It just works” moment

Recommendation

Based on interest in both low-level C implementation AND understanding services like Tailscale:

Start with Project 1 (TUN Packet Logger). This gives you the foundation everything else builds on. You can’t understand VPNs without understanding virtual network interfaces.

Then follow the progression:

Projects 1-3 give you a working encrypted VPN (like a minimal WireGuard)
Project 4 teaches you WireGuard’s actual security model
Project 5 reveals the Tailscale/Twingate secret sauce

If you’re particularly interested in Tailscale specifically, Project 5 is the payoff—but you need Projects 1-4 to appreciate what it’s doing.

Final Capstone Project: Mini-Tailscale

What you’ll build: A mesh VPN system where multiple peers can discover each other through a coordination server, establish direct encrypted connections via NAT traversal, and fall back to relay when direct connection fails. Essentially, a simplified Tailscale clone.

Why it teaches the full stack: This combines everything:

TUN interfaces (packet handling)
WireGuard-style encryption (ChaCha20-Poly1305)
Noise Protocol handshakes (authentication + key exchange)
NAT traversal (STUN + hole punching)
Coordination/control plane (peer discovery)
Relay fallback (TURN-style)

Core challenges you’ll face:

Designing a coordination protocol (peer registration, endpoint exchange)
Managing multiple simultaneous peer connections
Implementing connection state machines (handshaking, established, rekeying)
Building a relay server for when NAT traversal fails
Handling peer churn (joins, leaves, network changes)

Resources for key challenges:

Tailscale blog posts (tailscale.com/blog) - They explain their architecture openly
WireGuard whitepaper - The crypto/protocol foundation
“How NAT Traversal Works” by Tailscale - Their detailed explanation

Key Concepts:

Coordination plane design: Tailscale blog “How Tailscale Works”
Mesh networking: “Computer Networks” by Tanenbaum (overlay networks section)
DERP relay protocol: Tailscale’s DERP specification on GitHub
Connection state machines: WireGuard whitepaper (timer state machine)
Multi-peer management: “The Linux Programming Interface” by Kerrisk (Ch. 63 - epoll for many connections)

Difficulty: Advanced Time estimate: 1-2 months Prerequisites: All previous projects completed

Real world outcome:

Run coordination server on a public VPS
Install your VPN client on your laptop, phone, home server
All devices automatically discover each other and connect
ping laptop from phone works, routed through your mesh
Watch the mesh heal when a peer disconnects
See direct connections established (not relayed) in your logs

Learning milestones:

Two peers connect via coordination server - you understand control planes
Three+ peers form a full mesh - you understand peer management
NAT traversal works between home networks - you understand Tailscale’s core value
Relay fallback works when hole punch fails - you understand robustness
Peer can roam (change networks) and reconnect - you understand mobility

Additional Resources for Deep Study

For the truly deep dive, read the actual implementations:

WireGuard Source Code

Kernel module: git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux - See how the masters did it
Userspace Go implementation: git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-go - Easier to read than kernel C

Tailscale Source Code

github.com/tailscale/tailscale - Open source, well-documented Go code
Their DERP relay implementation shows how fallback works

Papers

“WireGuard: Next Generation Kernel Network Tunnel” by Jason Donenfeld - The whitepaper
“A Formal Security Analysis of the WireGuard Protocol” - Proves the protocol correct