Project 2: The Backward Chaining Engine (Build Your Own “Mini-Prolog”)
Build a backward chaining inference engine that answers queries by working backward through rules.
Quick Reference
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Difficulty | Level 3: Advanced |
| Time Estimate | 10-16 hours |
| Language | Python |
| Prerequisites | Project 1, recursion basics |
| Key Topics | backward chaining, unification, goal resolution |
1. Learning Objectives
By completing this project, you will:
- Implement rule-based backward chaining.
- Perform unification with variable bindings.
- Resolve goals recursively.
- Avoid infinite loops with visited checks.
- Explain inference traces.
2. Theoretical Foundation
2.1 Backward Chaining
Backward chaining starts from a goal and attempts to prove it by finding rules that could satisfy it.
3. Project Specification
3.1 What You Will Build
A mini-Prolog engine that proves queries using backward chaining and returns variable bindings.
3.2 Functional Requirements
- Rule base with premises and conclusions.
- Unification engine for patterns.
- Goal resolution with recursion.
- Trace output of inference steps.
- Loop detection for cyclic rules.
3.3 Non-Functional Requirements
- Deterministic results for identical queries.
- Readable trace logs.
- Configurable depth limits.
4. Solution Architecture
4.1 Components
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Rule Store | Store rules |
| Unifier | Bind variables |
| Resolver | Resolve goals |
| Tracer | Log inference steps |
5. Implementation Guide
5.1 Project Structure
SYMBOLIC_AI_AND_EXPERT_SYSTEMS_MASTERY/P02-backward-chaining/
├── src/
│ ├── rules.py
│ ├── unify.py
│ ├── resolve.py
│ └── trace.py
5.2 Implementation Phases
Phase 1: Rule store + unification (4-6h)
- Build rule structures and unifier.
- Checkpoint: unification returns bindings.
Phase 2: Resolver (4-6h)
- Implement backward chaining search.
- Checkpoint: simple queries resolve.
Phase 3: Tracing + limits (2-4h)
- Add inference trace and depth limits.
- Checkpoint: trace shows rule path.
6. Testing Strategy
6.1 Test Categories
| Category | Purpose | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | unifier | variable binding correctness |
| Integration | resolver | multi-step proofs |
| Regression | trace | deterministic outputs |
6.2 Critical Test Cases
- Recursive rules terminate with depth limit.
- Unification with multiple variables works.
- Trace output explains proof path.
7. Common Pitfalls & Debugging
| Pitfall | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Infinite recursion | stack overflow | add visited set |
| Wrong bindings | incorrect proofs | standardize variable names |
| Missing results | false negatives | expand search depth |
8. Extensions & Challenges
Beginner
- Add simple CLI query interface.
- Add rule explanations.
Intermediate
- Add cut operator (basic pruning).
- Add caching for subgoals.
Advanced
- Add probabilistic rules.
- Add performance benchmarking.
9. Real-World Connections
- Expert systems use backward chaining for diagnostics.
- Logic programming relies on goal resolution.
10. Resources
- Prolog tutorials
- Logic programming references
11. Self-Assessment Checklist
- I can implement backward chaining.
- I can unify variables correctly.
- I can trace inference steps.
12. Submission / Completion Criteria
Minimum Completion:
- Backward chaining with rule resolution
Full Completion:
- Trace logs + depth limits
Excellence:
- Caching or probabilistic rules
This guide was generated from project_based_ideas/AI_AGENTS_LLM_RAG/SYMBOLIC_AI_AND_EXPERT_SYSTEMS_MASTERY.md.