Project 15: Practical Data Competence Pipeline
Build a reproducible analytics pipeline from messy input data to a decision-ready memo.
Quick Reference
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Difficulty | Level 2: Intermediate |
| Time Estimate | 1-2 weeks |
| Main Programming Language | Python + SQL |
| Alternative Programming Languages | R, dbt-style workflows |
| Coolness Level | Level 3: Genuinely Clever |
| Business Potential | 3. Service & Support |
| Prerequisites | Projects 8-11 |
| Key Topics | Cleaning, missing data, feature engineering, visualization, reproducibility, communication |
1. Learning Objectives
- Enforce data contracts and quality gates.
- Handle missingness with explicit mechanism assumptions.
- Build leakage-safe feature engineering.
- Deliver reproducible, stakeholder-friendly outputs.
2. All Theory Needed (Per-Concept Breakdown)
2.1 Data Quality and Missingness
- Fundamentals: Statistical validity starts with data validity.
- Deep Dive into the concept: Missingness mechanism assumptions (MCAR/MAR/MNAR) determine which handling strategies are defensible.
2.2 Reproducibility and Communication
- Fundamentals: If results cannot be rerun and explained, they are operationally weak.
- Deep Dive into the concept: Run manifests, artifact hashes, and uncertainty-aware summaries create trust.
3. Project Specification
3.1 What You Will Build
A pipeline that ingests noisy data, validates schema and quality, handles missing data, engineers features, and publishes an executive memo.
3.2 Functional Requirements
- Schema/type/range validation module.
- Missingness report + strategy decision log.
- Feature engineering with leakage checks.
- Reproducibility package (configs, hashes, outputs).
3.3 Non-Functional Requirements
- Deterministic reruns with fixed seeds.
- Clear assumptions manifest.
3.4 Example Usage / Output
$ python practical_pipeline.py --run weekly_kpi
Schema violations fixed: 1402
Missingness strategy: MAR-impute on 6 fields, drop on 2
Feature checks: 18 passed, 1 warning
Reproducibility hash: 6fa2a9d1
Executive memo: outputs/practical_pipeline/weekly_kpi_brief.md
3.5 Real World Outcome
You deliver an auditable analysis package that another analyst can rerun and defend.
4. Solution Architecture
Raw input -> quality gate -> missingness module -> feature pipeline -> report + artifact bundle
5. Implementation Guide
5.1 Development Environment Setup
pip install pandas numpy duckdb
5.2 Project Structure
P15/
practical_pipeline.py
checks/
outputs/
manifests/
5.3 The Core Question You Are Answering
“Can this analysis be rerun, audited, and understood by others without hidden notebook state?”
5.4 Concepts You Must Understand First
- Data quality dimensions
- Missingness mechanisms
- Leakage and temporal cutoff rules
- Communication for non-technical audiences
5.5 Questions to Guide Your Design
- What quality failures block execution?
- How will you justify imputation choices?
- How will you represent uncertainty in executive summaries?
5.6 Thinking Exercise
Write two summaries of the same result: one technical and one executive. Compare language and detail.
5.7 The Interview Questions They’ll Ask
- What is target leakage and how do you detect it?
- How do you decide between drop vs impute?
- What does reproducibility mean in practice?
- How do you communicate uncertainty responsibly?
- What belongs in a run manifest?
5.8 Hints in Layers
- Hint 1: Build validation gates first.
- Hint 2: Add missingness strategy logging.
- Hint 3: Add leakage checks in feature pipeline.
- Hint 4: Add deterministic artifact packaging.
5.9 Books That Will Help
| Topic | Book | Chapter |
|---|---|---|
| Data workflow | The Art of Data Science | full text |
| Reproducibility | R for Data Science | workflow chapters |
| Communication | data storytelling references | selected |
6. Testing Strategy
- Schema-failure tests.
- Missingness injection tests.
- Rerun hash consistency tests.
7. Common Pitfalls & Debugging
| Pitfall | Symptom | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Hidden notebook state | irreproducible outputs | scriptable step pipeline |
| Untracked imputations | silent bias drift | mandatory strategy logs |
| Weak communication | stakeholder confusion | structured memo template |
8. Extensions & Challenges
- Add CI checks for data contracts.
- Add visualization linting rules.
9. Real-World Connections
- Analytics engineering foundations.
- Audit-ready KPI reporting.
10. Resources
- The Art of Data Science
- R for Data Science
11. Self-Assessment Checklist
- I can rerun end-to-end and reproduce outputs.
- I can defend missing-data decisions.
- I can communicate uncertainty to decision-makers.
12. Submission / Completion Criteria
Minimum: deterministic pipeline with quality gates and final memo.
Full: includes artifact bundle, manifests, and communication variants.