Project 9: Statistical Inference Workbench
Build an inference workbench for estimation, intervals, tests, and power-aware decision making.
Quick Reference
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Difficulty | Level 3: Advanced |
| Time Estimate | 2 weeks |
| Main Programming Language | Python |
| Alternative Programming Languages | R, Julia |
| Coolness Level | Level 4: Hardcore Tech Flex |
| Business Potential | 2. The “Micro-SaaS / Pro Tool” |
| Prerequisites | Projects 6-8 |
| Key Topics | Estimation, CI, hypothesis tests, power analysis |
1. Learning Objectives
- Implement point estimators and uncertainty intervals.
- Compare CLT and bootstrap confidence intervals.
- Select and run z/t/chi-square/ANOVA tests appropriately.
- Integrate power analysis into pre-analysis planning.
2. All Theory Needed (Per-Concept Breakdown)
2.1 Estimation and Interval Logic
- Fundamentals: Estimators map samples to parameter guesses; intervals communicate precision.
- Deep Dive into the concept: Bias/variance tradeoffs, asymptotic approximations, and bootstrap alternatives shape confidence in estimates.
2.2 Testing and Decision Errors
- Fundamentals: Hypothesis tests evaluate compatibility of data with null assumptions.
- Deep Dive into the concept: Type I/II tradeoffs and power planning determine practical decision reliability.
3. Project Specification
3.1 What You Will Build
A CLI workbench that produces estimates, intervals, test results, and power-based decision notes.
3.2 Functional Requirements
- Point estimation module for means/proportions.
- CI module (normal approx + bootstrap).
- Test module (z, t, chi-square, ANOVA).
- Power planning and minimum sample size recommendations.
3.3 Non-Functional Requirements
- Reproducible test runs and report manifests.
- Explicit assumptions logged per method.
3.4 Example Usage / Output
$ python inference_workbench.py --config configs/uplift.yaml
Point estimate: 0.0132
95% CI (CLT): [0.0041, 0.0223]
95% CI (bootstrap): [0.0038, 0.0227]
p-value: 0.0047
Power: 0.91
Decision: effect likely above practical threshold
3.5 Real World Outcome
You produce inference reports that are explicit about uncertainty and error costs, not only significance labels.
4. Solution Architecture
Input config -> estimator/CI/test modules -> power module -> decision report
5. Implementation Guide
5.1 Development Environment Setup
pip install numpy scipy statsmodels
5.2 Project Structure
P09/
inference_workbench.py
configs/
outputs/
5.3 The Core Question You Are Answering
“What conclusion is justified given uncertainty, assumptions, and error costs?”
5.4 Concepts You Must Understand First
- Bias and variance
- Confidence intervals
- Hypothesis testing framework
- Power and effect size
5.5 Questions to Guide Your Design
- Which test is valid for each data type/assumption set?
- How will you encode practical significance thresholds?
- How do you prevent p-hacking workflows?
5.6 Thinking Exercise
Explain how two analyses with the same p-value can lead to opposite business decisions.
5.7 The Interview Questions They’ll Ask
- What does a confidence interval mean?
- Why can significant results be practically trivial?
- When use bootstrap CI over CLT CI?
- What is the difference between Type I and Type II errors?
- Why is power analysis pre-study critical?
5.8 Hints in Layers
- Hint 1: Implement one test path first.
- Hint 2: Add interval alternatives.
- Hint 3: Add power logic and planning mode.
- Hint 4: Add assumptions audit in final report.
5.9 Books That Will Help
| Topic | Book | Chapter |
|---|---|---|
| Inference foundations | Casella & Berger | Ch. 7-10 |
| Practical testing | OpenIntro Statistics | inference chapters |
| Power planning | applied biostatistics references | selected |
6. Testing Strategy
- Validate against known textbook examples.
- Compare CI methods on skewed synthetic data.
- Verify power outputs against external calculators.
7. Common Pitfalls & Debugging
| Pitfall | Symptom | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Wrong test selection | conflicting conclusions | assumption-driven routing |
| Missing practical threshold | overreaction to tiny effects | effect-size gate |
| No power planning | underpowered studies | pre-analysis sample-size module |
8. Extensions & Challenges
- Add sequential testing controls.
- Add equivalence testing path.
9. Real-World Connections
- Product A/B decision systems.
- Clinical and quality-control decision pipelines.
10. Resources
- Casella & Berger
- OpenIntro Statistics
11. Self-Assessment Checklist
- I can pick tests from assumptions.
- I can explain CI and p-value limitations.
- I can plan study power before data collection.
12. Submission / Completion Criteria
Minimum: one complete estimator+CI+test+power pipeline.
Full: supports multiple metric types with assumptions audit trails.