Project 4: Delivery Route Optimizer
Build a routing tool that optimizes delivery routes using real road networks and constraints.
Quick Reference
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Difficulty | Advanced |
| Time Estimate | 2-3 weeks |
| Language | Python |
| Prerequisites | Graph theory basics, optimization concepts |
| Key Topics | geocoding, routing graphs, VRP, constraints |
| Output | Optimized route map + CSV |
Learning Objectives
By completing this project, you will:
- Geocode addresses into coordinates with caching.
- Build a road network and compute travel-time matrices.
- Solve a TSP/VRP with constraints (time windows, capacity).
- Visualize the optimized route on a map.
- Compare route quality against a naive baseline.
- Explain trade-offs between solution quality and compute time.
The Core Question You’re Answering
“How do I compute an efficient delivery route using real roads and real constraints?”
This is the core logistics problem for delivery companies, field services, and routing platforms.
Concepts You Must Understand First
| Concept | Why It Matters | Where to Learn |
|---|---|---|
| Geocoding | Addresses must become coordinates | GeoPy docs |
| Routing graphs | Roads are graphs of nodes/edges | OSMnx docs |
| TSP/VRP | Optimization problem definition | OR-Tools docs |
| Constraints | Real delivery needs limits | OR-Tools examples |
| Distance matrix | Solver input format | Routing tutorials |
Key Concepts Deep Dive
- Geocoding Reliability
- Address parsing is imperfect; cache results and allow manual fixes.
- Road Network vs Euclidean Distance
- Straight-line distance is misleading for cities with rivers, highways, and one-ways.
- VRP vs TSP
- TSP: one vehicle, minimize distance.
- VRP: multiple vehicles, time windows, capacity.
Theoretical Foundation
Routing Pipeline
Addresses -> Geocode -> Road Graph -> Travel Matrix -> VRP Solver -> Route Map
Why Constraints Matter
A route optimized for distance may violate time windows or overload a vehicle. Real-world routing must balance cost, time, and capacity.
Project Specification
What You Will Build
A tool that takes a CSV of delivery stops, computes an optimized route, and outputs a map and ordered stop list.
Functional Requirements
- Read CSV with addresses and optional time windows.
- Geocode addresses with caching and error handling.
- Build a travel-time matrix using road network distances.
- Solve a TSP or VRP with OR-Tools.
- Output ordered stops, total distance, and travel time.
- Render route map with numbered stops.
Non-Functional Requirements
- Reliability: Handle failed geocodes gracefully.
- Transparency: Print solver assumptions and constraints.
- Reproducibility: Cache geocoding results.
Example Usage / Output
$ python route_optimizer.py --input data/stops.csv --start "123 Main St, Springfield"
Optimized route saved to output/route.html
Total distance: 28.4 km
Estimated travel time: 52 min
Real World Outcome
You open output/route.html and see:
- A polyline showing the optimized route.
- Numbered markers for each stop.
- A summary box listing total distance and time.
- A CSV of stops in optimized order.
Solution Architecture
High-Level Design
CSV -> Geocode -> Graph -> Distance Matrix -> OR-Tools -> Map
Key Components
| Component | Responsibility | Key Decisions |
|---|---|---|
| Geocoder | Address to coordinate | Provider + rate limits |
| Router | Build graph + distances | OSMnx vs external API |
| Solver | Optimize route | TSP vs VRP |
| Visualizer | Map output | Folium styling |
Data Structures
list[tuple] # coordinates
list[list] # distance matrix
Algorithm Overview
- Geocode addresses to coordinates.
- Build road graph for bounding area.
- Compute travel time matrix between all stops.
- Solve TSP/VRP using OR-Tools.
- Render route on map and export CSV.
Complexity
- Distance matrix: O(n^2)
- VRP solving: NP-hard, heuristic approach.
Implementation Guide
Development Environment Setup
python -m venv geo-env
source geo-env/bin/activate
pip install osmnx geopy ortools folium
Project Structure
project-root/
├── data/
│ └── stops.csv
├── src/
│ ├── geocode.py
│ ├── routing.py
│ └── solver.py
├── output/
│ ├── route.html
│ └── route.csv
└── README.md
The Core Question You’re Answering
“How do I minimize travel cost while respecting real-world constraints?”
Concepts You Must Understand First
- Shortest paths: Dijkstra or A* on road graphs.
- Matrix building: Pairwise travel times.
- Constraints: Time windows, depot location, capacity.
Questions to Guide Your Design
- How will you handle failed geocodes?
- What is a good fallback for large datasets?
- What constraints matter most for your use case?
- How will you compare your solution to a naive route?
Thinking Exercise
Take 5 addresses and estimate a naive route order. Compare to a solver output. How much improvement do you see?
Interview Questions
- What is the difference between TSP and VRP?
- Why do you need a distance matrix?
- How do you handle geocoding errors?
- Why is Euclidean distance misleading for routing?
- What constraints are most common in routing problems?
- How would you scale this to 1000 stops?
Hints in Layers
- Hint 1: Start with 5-10 stops and a TSP.
- Hint 2: Cache geocodes to avoid rate limits.
- Hint 3: Use bounding boxes to reduce graph size.
- Hint 4: Compare results to a naive route for validation.
Books That Will Help
| Topic | Book | Chapter |
|---|---|---|
| Routing | OR-Tools docs | Routing section |
| Graphs | “Grokking Algorithms” | Dijkstra |
| Geocoding | GeoPy docs | Geocoding |
Implementation Phases
Phase 1: Geocoding and Graph (4-5 days)
- Parse CSV and geocode addresses.
- Build road network for region.
Checkpoint: Stops plotted on a map.
Phase 2: Distance Matrix and Solver (5-7 days)
- Compute travel time matrix.
- Solve TSP or VRP.
Checkpoint: Ordered route produced with totals.
Phase 3: Visualization and Output (3-4 days)
- Render route polyline.
- Export CSV and HTML.
Checkpoint: Map and route report ready.
Key Implementation Decisions
| Decision | Options | Recommendation | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Routing data | OSMnx, external API | OSMnx | No API key needed |
| Solver | exact, heuristic | heuristic | Scales better |
| Constraints | none, time windows | minimal first | Reduce complexity |
Testing Strategy
| Category | Purpose | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Geocoding | Address resolution | Check coordinates |
| Matrix | Size correctness | n x n matrix |
| Solver | Route validity | No duplicate stops |
Critical cases:
- Invalid address.
- Duplicate stops.
- Large stop counts.
Common Pitfalls and Debugging
| Pitfall | Symptom | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Rate-limited geocoding | Errors | Add caching and delays |
| Wrong coordinate order | Route off-map | Verify lon/lat ordering |
| Huge matrix | Memory error | Limit stops or chunk |
Extensions and Challenges
- Add multiple vehicles and capacity limits.
- Add live traffic weighting.
- Build a web UI for dispatchers.
Real-World Connections
- Logistics and last-mile delivery.
- Field service routing and scheduling.
Resources
- OR-Tools: https://developers.google.com/optimization
- OSMnx: https://osmnx.readthedocs.io/
- GeoPy: https://geopy.readthedocs.io/
Self-Assessment Checklist
- I can compute routes using road networks.
- I can explain VRP constraints.
- I can validate route quality against a baseline.
Submission / Completion Criteria
Minimum Viable Completion
- Geocode stops and compute a TSP route.
Full Completion
- VRP with at least one constraint + map output.
Excellence
- Multi-vehicle routing and traffic integration.
This guide was generated from GEOSPATIAL_PYTHON_LEARNING_PROJECTS.md. For the complete learning path, see the parent directory GEOSPATIAL_PYTHON_LEARNING_PROJECTS/README.md.