← Back to all projects

EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATION FOR ENGINEERS MASTERY

In the engineering world, correctness is the ultimate currency. In the executive world, clarity and impact are the ultimate currencies. Most engineers struggle to get buy-in not because their technical ideas are wrong, but because they are presented as technical problems rather than business opportunities.

Executive Communication for Engineers Mastery

Goal: Deeply understand how to translate complex technical realities into high-stakes business decisions. You will learn to move beyond “how things work” to explaining “why they matter” in the language of executives: revenue, risk, cost, and time. By the end of these projects, you will be able to write concise one-pagers, quantify technical debt as financial risk, and lead strategic discussions with non-technical stakeholders.

Why Executive Communication Matters

In the engineering world, “correctness” is the ultimate currency. In the executive world, “clarity and impact” are the ultimate currencies. Most engineers struggle to get buy-in not because their technical ideas are wrong, but because they are presented as technical problems rather than business opportunities.

The Communication Gap

   ENGINEERING FOCUS                     EXECUTIVE FOCUS
   (The "How")                           (The "What" and "Why")
   ┌──────────────────────┐              ┌──────────────────────┐
   │  Architecture        │              │  Revenue / Growth    │
   │  Latency / Scale     │              │  Cost / Efficiency   │
   │  Code Quality        │      ──►     │  Risk Mitigation     │
   │  Implementation      │              │  Time to Market      │
   │  Correctness         │              │  Strategic Advantage │
   └──────────────────────┘              └──────────────────────┘
             ▲                                     ▲
             │                                     │
             └─────────── THE TRANSLATION ─────────┘

When you speak to a CEO or CFO about “microservices architecture,” they hear “unquantified cost and complexity.” When you speak about “improving developer velocity by 20% to hit the Q3 product roadmap,” they hear “growth.”

Real-World Impact

Budget Approval: The difference between getting $1M for a refactor or $0 is often the narrative.
Career Growth: Staff and Principal roles are 50-70% communication and influence.
System Stability: Executives don’t fund “clean code”; they fund “reducing the $50k/hour risk of downtime.”

Core Concept Analysis

1. The Pyramid Principle (Barbara Minto)

Most engineers write chronologically: “We did X, then Y, then Z, and therefore our conclusion is C.” Executives read the opposite way.

The Engineering Narrative (Chronological):

Context
Technical Data
Observations
Conclusion (At the end)

The Executive Narrative (Pyramid):

The Answer (BLUF): What should we do?
Key Arguments: Why should we do it? (Cost, Risk, Opportunity)
Supporting Data: The evidence for those arguments.

          ┌─────────────────────────┐
          │   THE RECOMMENDATION    │ (The "Answer")
          └────────────┬────────────┘
                       │
          ┌────────────┴────────────┐
    ┌─────┴─────┐        ┌──────────┴────────┐
    │  Reason 1 │        │     Reason 2      │ (The "Why")
    └─────┬─────┘        └──────────┬────────┘
          │                         │
    ┌─────┴─────┐        ┌──────────┴────────┐
    │   Data    │        │      Data         │ (The "How")
    └───────────┘        └───────────────────┘

2. Tradeoff Analysis (The “Iron Triangle” Plus)

Engineering is the art of tradeoffs. Executives need to see these tradeoffs clearly to make a decision. A good executive narrative never presents “The Only Way”; it presents “Options with Consequences.”

Feature	Option A (Fast)	Option B (Balanced)	Option C (Robust)
Cost	Low	Medium	High
Risk	High (Debt)	Low	Very Low
Time	2 Weeks	6 Weeks	3 Months

3. Risk Quantification

Engineers often say “this is risky.” Executives need to know:

Financial Risk: “If we don’t do this, we lose $10k per week in cloud waste.”
Reputational Risk: “This vulnerability affects 15% of our Enterprise customers.”
Operational Risk: “This system is a single point of failure with a 48-hour recovery time.”

Concept Summary Table

Concept Cluster	What You Need to Internalize
BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)	Lead with the conclusion. Never make an executive “hunt” for your recommendation.
Audience Mapping	CFOs care about money; CTOs care about debt; Product VPs care about features. Map your narrative to their pain.
Tradeoff Frameworks	Present decisions as a menu of choices (A, B, or C) with clear pros, cons, and costs for each.
Narrative Over Technicals	Use data to support a story, not as the story itself. Connect technical metrics to business outcomes.
Conciseness as Respect	Every extra sentence in an executive memo is a tax on their time. If it’s not essential, delete it.

Deep Dive Reading by Concept

Strategic Leadership & Narrative

Concept	Book & Chapter
Strategic Thinking	“The Engineering Executive’s Primer” by Will Larson — Ch. 3: “Formulating Technology Strategy”
Narrative Structure	“The Pyramid Principle” by Barbara Minto — Part 1: “The Logic of Writing”
Making Ideas Stick	“Made to Stick” by Chip & Dan Heath — Ch. 1: “Simple” and Ch. 3: “Concrete”

Influence & Communication

Concept	Book & Chapter
Managing Conflict	“Crucial Conversations” by Patterson et al. — Ch. 3: “Start with Heart”
Staff Level Influence	“Staff Engineer” by Will Larson — Ch. 2: “Operating at Staff Level”
Business Value	“The Phoenix Project” by Gene Kim — Ch. 18-22 (The “Three Ways” and Business Alignment)

Essential Reading Order

Foundation (Week 1):
- The Pyramid Principle (Part 1): Master the top-down structure.
- The Engineering Executive’s Primer (Ch. 1-2): Understand the executive mindset.

Project List

Projects are designed to move from basic narrative structure to complex, multi-stakeholder strategy.

File: PROJECT_01_REFACTOR_ONE_PAGER.md
Main Programming Language: Narrative (Markdown/Prose)
Alternative Programming Languages: Slide Deck (Keynote/PowerPoint)
Coolness Level: Level 1: Pure Corporate Snoozefest
Business Potential: 1. The “Resume Gold”
Difficulty: Level 2: Intermediate
Knowledge Area: Narrative Strategy / Financial Justification
Software or Tool: Amazon-style “1-page” memo format
Main Book: “The Pyramid Principle” by Barbara Minto

What you’ll build: A concise, 1-page executive memo proposing a major technical refactor (e.g., migrating a legacy database) that requires significant engineering time.

Why it teaches Executive Communication: It forces you to stop talking about “clean code” and start talking about “developer velocity” and “risk of failure.” You’ll learn to lead with the recommendation.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Translating “Spaghetti Code” to business risk → maps to Risk Quantification
Justifying 3 months of “no new features” → maps to Opportunity Cost Analysis
Creating a BLUF that gets a “Yes” in 30 seconds → maps to The Pyramid Principle

Key Concepts:

BLUF: “The Pyramid Principle” (Part 1)
Cost-Benefit Analysis: “The Engineering Executive’s Primer” (Ch. 12)

Difficulty: Intermediate Time estimate: 3-4 hours Prerequisites: Understanding of a real technical debt problem.

Real World Outcome

You will have a professional document that you could realistically present to a CTO. Success is defined by a document under 500 words with no undefined technical jargon.

Example Output:

# MEMORANDUM: API v2 Migration

**TO**: CTO / VP Product
**FROM**: [Your Name]
**SUBJECT**: Reducing Checkout Latency via API V2

### 1. Recommendation (BLUF)
Allocate 3 engineers for 6 weeks to complete the API v2 migration. This will reduce checkout latency by 40% and eliminate $4k/month in legacy costs.

### 2. The Problem
Our current V1 API is causing a 4-second delay in checkout, correlating with a 15% abandonment rate. 

### 3. Proposed Options
| Option | Effort | Outcome | Risk |
|--------|--------|---------|------|
| A: Status Quo | 0 weeks | No improvement | High (Outage) |
| B: Migration | 6 weeks | 40% Latency ↓ | Low |

### 4. Financial Impact
- Estimated Revenue Gain: $12k / month
- ROI: Project pays for itself in 4 months.

The Core Question You’re Answering

“If I give you my most expensive resource (engineer time) for 2 months, how does it make the company more successful?”

Concepts You Must Understand First

Stop and research these before coding:

Opportunity Cost
- What features AREN’T we building if we do this?
- Book Reference: “The Engineering Executive’s Primer” Ch. 4
The 3 Business Pillars
- Revenue, Cost, and Risk.

Questions to Guide Your Design

The “Mom” Test: Could a non-technical person understand the value?
The “CFO” Test: Have you quantified the cost of the status quo?

Thinking Exercise

The Jargon Translation

Translate: “The database is old and slow.” Executive translation: “Our data layer is hitting a performance ceiling that will prevent scaling past 10k users, risking a total outage during the Q4 sale.”

The Interview Questions They’ll Ask

“Why should we do this now instead of next year?”
“What happens if we only do 50% of this work?”
“What are the risks of the migration failing?”

Hints in Layers

Hint 1: Start with the impact Don’t start with the technical problem. Start with the money or the time saved.

Hint 2: Use a table Comparison tables are the fastest way for an executive to see tradeoffs.

Hint 3: Use the “Rule of Three” Limit your arguments to the three strongest reasons.

Books That Will Help

Topic	Book	Chapter
Structure	“The Pyramid Principle”	Ch. 1
Strategy	“The Engineering Executive’s Primer”	Ch. 3

Project 2: The Executive Incident Post-Mortem

File: PROJECT_02_EXECUTIVE_POST_MORTEM.md
Main Programming Language: Narrative
Alternative Programming Languages: Incident.io templates
Coolness Level: Level 3: Genuinely Clever
Business Potential: 3. The “Service & Support” Model
Difficulty: Level 2: Intermediate
Knowledge Area: Crisis Communication
Main Book: “Crucial Conversations” by Patterson et al.

What you’ll build: A “State of the Union” incident report after a 4-hour production outage.

Why it teaches Executive Communication: You’ll learn to communicate with “High Heart and High Head”—acknowledging impact while providing a clinical path forward.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Explaining a “Race Condition” without the jargon → maps to Abstracting Complexity
Taking ownership without “Blame” → maps to Systems Thinking

Real World Outcome

A 2-page report that turns a disaster into a trust-building exercise.

Example Output:

# INCIDENT REPORT: Billing System Outage (2025-12-25)

**Status**: Resolved
**Total Downtime**: 4 Hours
**Revenue Impact**: $20k in delayed processing

### Summary
On Dec 25, a synchronization error in the billing database prevented 15k users from upgrading. 

### Root Cause
An unexpected surge in traffic triggered a locking mechanism designed for lower volumes.

### Remediation Plan
1. [Immediate] Increased connection pool limits.
2. [Short-term] Implementing circuit breakers.

Project 3: The “Build vs. Buy” Decision Matrix

File: PROJECT_03_BUILD_VS_BUY.md
Main Programming Language: Analysis (Spreadsheet)
Coolness Level: Level 2: Practical but Forgettable
Business Potential: 4. The “Open Core” Infrastructure
Difficulty: Level 3: Advanced
Knowledge Area: TCO / Strategic Planning
Main Book: “The Engineering Executive’s Primer” by Will Larson

What you’ll build: A strategic recommendation comparing building a custom Auth service in-house vs. buying a vendor like Auth0.

Why it teaches Executive Communication: It forces you to calculate “Fully Loaded Cost” of engineers vs. SaaS subscriptions.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Calculating the “Maintenance Tax” → maps to Long-term Liability

Project 4: The “Sunsetting” Strategy

File: PROJECT_04_SUNSETTING_STRATEGY.md
Main Programming Language: Narrative
Alternative Programming Languages: Customer Communication Templates
Coolness Level: Level 2: Practical but Forgettable
Business Potential: 3. The “Service & Support” Model
Difficulty: Level 3: Advanced
Knowledge Area: Lifecycle Management / Product Strategy
Software or Tool: Product Roadmap / Churn Analysis
Main Book: “The Engineering Executive’s Primer” by Will Larson

What you’ll build: A narrative proposing the “Sunsetting” (shutdown) of a legacy product or feature that still has users but is draining 30% of engineering maintenance time.

Why it teaches Executive Communication: You’ll learn to handle the “Loss Aversion” of executives. You must prove that the cost of keeping it alive is higher than the risk of losing the users.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Defining the “Total Cost of Ownership” (TCO) → maps to Financial Modeling
Drafting the “Difficult Conversation” script for Sales/Support → maps to Stakeholder Alignment
Proposing the “Migration Path” → maps to Risk Mitigation

Real World Outcome

A strategic plan including a “Stop-Start-Continue” analysis and a timeline for decommissioning.

Example Output:

## Proposal: Sunsetting the v1 Data Export Tool

**Why**: Maintenance costs $150k/year in engineer time. Only 3% of users use it.
**The Pivot**: Reallocate those engineers to the "Real-time Dashboard" (our #1 requested feature).
**Timeline**: 
- Jan: Announce sunset.
- Feb: Migration tool release.
- March: Hard shutdown.

Project 5: The Cloud Migration Business Case

File: PROJECT_05_CLOUD_MIGRATION.md
Main Programming Language: Analysis / Financial Modeling
Alternative Programming Languages: Terraform/Infra-as-Code (for cost tagging simulation)
Coolness Level: Level 3: Genuinely Clever
Business Potential: 4. The “Open Core” Infrastructure
Difficulty: Level 4: Expert
Knowledge Area: Cloud Economics / Infrastructure Strategy
Software or Tool: AWS/GCP Pricing Calculators
Main Book: “Cloud FinOps” by J.R. Storment

What you’ll build: A multi-year roadmap and financial case for migrating from self-hosted servers to the public cloud (or vice-versa).

Why it teaches Executive Communication: Executives view the cloud as an expense, not a tech choice. You’ll learn to talk about OpEx vs. CapEx and “elasticity” as a business agility tool.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Modeling the “Cloud Exit” or “Cloud Entry” costs → maps to Financial Forecasting
Explaining “Reliability” in dollars → maps to Risk-Adjusted Return

Project 6: The Security Vulnerability Briefing

File: PROJECT_06_SECURITY_BRIEFING.md
Main Programming Language: Narrative
Alternative Programming Languages: Risk Heatmap (Visualization)
Coolness Level: Level 4: Hardcore Tech Flex
Business Potential: 3. The “Service & Support” Model
Difficulty: Level 3: Advanced
Knowledge Area: Cybersecurity / Corporate Governance
Software or Tool: NIST Framework / CVE Databases
Main Book: “Math for Security” by Daniel Reilly

What you’ll build: A 10-minute “Board Deck” or memo briefing the executive team on a critical security vulnerability (e.g., Log4Shell style) and why the company needs to spend $200k on a security audit.

Why it teaches Executive Communication: Fear-mongering doesn’t work long-term. You’ll learn to use the FAIR model (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) to quantify probability and impact.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Mapping a CVE score to a Dollar Loss → maps to Quantitative Risk Analysis

Project 7: The “Staffing Plan” / Hiring Case

File: PROJECT_07_STAFFING_PLAN.md
Main Programming Language: Narrative / Resource Modeling
Alternative Programming Languages: Organization Charting (Mermaid/Lucidchart)
Coolness Level: Level 2: Practical but Forgettable
Business Potential: 1. The “Resume Gold”
Difficulty: Level 3: Advanced
Knowledge Area: Talent Strategy / Operational Planning
Software or Tool: Headcount Budgeting
Main Book: “The Engineering Executive’s Primer” by Will Larson

What you’ll build: A narrative proposal for expanding the engineering team by 10 people. You must justify the specific roles (SRE, Frontend, Mobile) and map them to the 12-month product roadmap.

Why it teaches Executive Communication: CFOs see people as “Burn Rate.” You’ll learn to see them as “Throughput.” You’ll map “Hiring” to “Unblocking Revenue.”

Core challenges you’ll face:

Calculating the “Ramp-up Time” (The J-Curve) → maps to Productivity Modeling
Justifying “Support Roles” (SRE/QA) vs “Feature Roles” → maps to System Health

Project 8: The “Platform Engineering” Pitch

File: PROJECT_08_PLATFORM_PITCH.md
Main Programming Language: Narrative
Alternative Programming Languages: Architecture Diagrams
Coolness Level: Level 3: Genuinely Clever
Business Potential: 5. The “Industry Disruptor”
Difficulty: Level 4: Expert
Knowledge Area: Developer Experience (DX) / Internal Platforms
Software or Tool: IDP (Internal Developer Platform) concepts
Main Book: “Team Topologies” by Matthew Skelton

What you’ll build: A pitch for creating a dedicated “Platform Team” to build internal tools (The “Golden Path”). You must explain why spending 20% of engineering resources on ourselves makes us 50% faster at building for customers.

Why it teaches Executive Communication: This is the hardest pitch in engineering. You’ll learn to explain the “Cognitive Load” of developers as a business bottleneck.

Project 9: The Quarterly “State of the Union” Report

File: PROJECT_09_QUARTERLY_REPORT.md
Main Programming Language: Data Visualization / Narrative
Alternative Programming Languages: Business Intelligence (BI) Tools
Coolness Level: Level 2: Practical but Forgettable
Business Potential: 1. The “Resume Gold”
Difficulty: Level 2: Intermediate
Knowledge Area: Performance Metrics / Accountability
Software or Tool: DORA Metrics / OKRs (Objectives and Key Results)
Main Book: “Accelerate” by Nicole Forsgren

What you’ll build: A summary report for the CEO/Board covering Q4. It must balance “The Wins” with “The Blockers” and provide a preview of Q1.

Why it teaches Executive Communication: You’ll learn the art of “No Surprises.” You’ll communicate failure in a way that preserves trust and success in a way that avoids arrogance.

Core challenges you’ll face:

Selecting the 3 metrics that actually matter → maps to Metric Curation

Project 10: The “Crisis” Pivot

File: PROJECT_10_CRISIS_PIVOT.md
Main Programming Language: Narrative / Crisis Management
Coolness Level: Level 3: Genuinely Clever
Business Potential: 3. The “Service & Support” Model
Difficulty: Level 4: Expert
Knowledge Area: Change Management / Strategy Execution
Main Book: “The Phoenix Project” by Gene Kim

What you’ll build: A “Call to Action” memo for the engineering org (50+ people) explaining an immediate stop to all non-critical work to focus on a new competitor threat or a massive security flaw.

Why it teaches Executive Communication: You’ll learn to manage “Organizational Inertia.” You must provide the “Burning Platform” narrative that makes the pain of staying the same greater than the pain of changing.

Project 11: The Competitive Tech Analysis

File: PROJECT_11_COMPETITIVE_ANALYSIS.md
Main Programming Language: Strategy / Competitive Intel
Coolness Level: Level 3: Genuinely Clever
Business Potential: 5. The “Industry Disruptor”
Difficulty: Level 3: Advanced
Knowledge Area: Market Analysis / Tech Advantage
Main Book: “Technology Strategy Patterns” by Eben Hewitt

What you’ll build: A briefing explaining why a competitor’s use of a specific technology (e.g., Serverless, AI-integrated workflows, or a proprietary Edge network) gives them a business advantage in time-to-market or margin.

Project 12: The “Vendor Negotiation” Brief

File: PROJECT_12_VENDOR_NEGOTIATION.md
Main Programming Language: Narrative / Negotiation
Coolness Level: Level 2: Practical but Forgettable
Business Potential: 4. The “Open Core” Infrastructure
Difficulty: Level 3: Advanced
Knowledge Area: Procurement / Technical Leverage
Main Book: “The Engineering Executive’s Primer” by Will Larson

What you’ll build: A “Cheat Sheet” for the CFO for an upcoming $1M contract renewal with a major cloud or SaaS vendor. You must identify “Technical Leverage” (e.g., “We can move 40% of this workload to Open Source in 3 months”) that they can use to lower the price.

Project Comparison Table

Project	Difficulty	Time	Depth of Understanding	Fun Factor
1. One-Pager	Level 2	4h	High (The “Why”)	★★★☆☆
2. Post-Mortem	Level 2	4h	High (Trust)	★★★★☆
3. Build vs Buy	Level 3	8h	High (Financials)	★★★☆☆
5. Cloud Migration	Level 4	2w	Very High (Strategy)	★★★★☆
6. Security Brief	Level 3	6h	High (Risk)	★★★★★
8. Platform Pitch	Level 4	1w	High (Influence)	★★★★☆
10. Crisis Pivot	Level 4	4h	High (Leadership)	★★★★★

Recommendation

If you are a Senior Engineer: Start with Project 1 (One-Pager) and Project 2 (Post-Mortem). These are the “bread and butter” of Staff-level work.

If you are moving into Management: Focus on Project 3 (Build vs Buy) and Project 7 (Staffing Plan) to understand the financial side of leadership.

If you are aiming for Director/VP: Project 5 (Cloud Migration) and Project 10 (Crisis Pivot) are your graduation requirements.

Final Overall Project: The “Technology Strategy for 2026”

What you’ll build: A comprehensive, 6-page narrative (Amazon Style) that outlines the technology strategy for the next 18 months. It must cover:

The Mission: How tech enables the company mission.
Current State: Top 3 technical debts and their costs.
Strategic Initiatives: The 3 big bets (AI, Infrastructure, etc.).
Resource Requirements: People and Budget.
Key Risks: What could kill the company from a tech perspective.

Summary

This learning path covers Executive Communication for Engineers through 12 hands-on narrative and strategic projects.

#	Project Name	Main Language	Difficulty	Time Estimate
1	The “One-Pager” Refactor	Narrative	Intermediate	4 Hours
2	Executive Post-Mortem	Narrative	Intermediate	4 Hours
3	Build vs Buy Matrix	Analysis	Advanced	1 Day
4	Sunsetting Strategy	Narrative	Advanced	1 Day
5	Cloud Migration Case	Financial	Expert	2 Weeks
6	Security Briefing	Narrative	Advanced	6 Hours
7	Staffing Plan	Narrative	Advanced	1 Day
8	Platform Engineering Pitch	Narrative	Expert	1 Week
9	Quarterly “SOTU” Report	Narrative	Intermediate	1 Day
10	The Crisis Pivot	Narrative	Expert	4 Hours
11	Competitive Tech Analysis	Strategy	Advanced	1 Day
12	Vendor Negotiation Brief	Narrative	Advanced	6 Hours

Expected Outcomes

After completing these projects, you will:

Stop speaking in jargon and start speaking in “Business Yield.”
Be able to quantify technical debt as financial and operational risk.
Master the “Pyramid Principle” to get quick buy-in for your ideas.
Understand the financial basics of engineer headcount and SaaS TCO.
Build higher levels of trust with non-technical executives through transparent communication.

Executive Communication for Engineers Mastery

Why Executive Communication Matters

The Communication Gap

Real-World Impact

Core Concept Analysis

1. The Pyramid Principle (Barbara Minto)

2. Tradeoff Analysis (The “Iron Triangle” Plus)

3. Risk Quantification

Concept Summary Table

Deep Dive Reading by Concept

Strategic Leadership & Narrative

Influence & Communication

Essential Reading Order

Project List

Project 1: The “One-Pager” Refactor Proposal

Real World Outcome

The Core Question You’re Answering

Concepts You Must Understand First

Questions to Guide Your Design

Thinking Exercise

The Jargon Translation

The Interview Questions They’ll Ask

Hints in Layers

Books That Will Help

Project 2: The Executive Incident Post-Mortem

Real World Outcome

Project 3: The “Build vs. Buy” Decision Matrix

Calculating the “Maintenance Tax” → maps to Long-term Liability

Project 4: The “Sunsetting” Strategy

Real World Outcome

Project 5: The Cloud Migration Business Case

Project 6: The Security Vulnerability Briefing

Mapping a CVE score to a Dollar Loss → maps to Quantitative Risk Analysis

Project 7: The “Staffing Plan” / Hiring Case

Project 8: The “Platform Engineering” Pitch

Project 9: The Quarterly “State of the Union” Report

Selecting the 3 metrics that actually matter → maps to Metric Curation

Project 10: The “Crisis” Pivot

Project 11: The Competitive Tech Analysis

Project 12: The “Vendor Negotiation” Brief

Project Comparison Table

Recommendation

Final Overall Project: The “Technology Strategy for 2026”

Summary

Expected Outcomes